<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Mechanics on Shiraz</title>
    <link>https://shiraz-k.com/tags/mechanics/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Mechanics on Shiraz</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 21:23:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://shiraz-k.com/tags/mechanics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Representing Spatial Velocities</title>
      <link>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/robotics/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 21:23:17 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/robotics/</guid>
      <description>I&amp;rsquo;ve been going through Russ Tedrake&amp;rsquo;s notes on robotics, which got me thinking about their so-called monogram notation. The result of this deliberation was a new notation for spatial velocities that bridges the gap between abstract Lie groups and their applications to robotics and computer graphics.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Euler-Poincaré Equations</title>
      <link>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/ep/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:18:04 -0500</pubDate>
      <guid>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/ep/</guid>
      <description>Poincaré&amp;rsquo;s 1901 paper introduces (in just a humble 3 pages) the Euler-Poincaré equations, which are the specialization of the Euler-Lagrange equations to the case where a Lie group acts on the configuration manifold. I work through Poincaré&amp;rsquo;s paper without making too many identifications.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Classical Mechanics on Manifolds</title>
      <link>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/symplectic/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 14:45:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid>https://shiraz-k.com/posts/symplectic/</guid>
      <description>Despite having encountered the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalisms of mechanics several times in a variety of engineering and physics settings, I had never been able to retain it in my memory. In this post, I would like to collect my thoughts on their differential geometric treatment, which assumes a very simple and memorable form once we introduce the language of symplectic geometry.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
